D/s-BDSM: Is it degrading to women?

In the ‘information age’, when an abundance of knowledge on practically every human topic is just a mouse-click away, I am still amazed at the amount of myths that not only refuse to die but seem to flourish.

A standard myth attached to D/s – BDSM is the misconception that the majority of these relationships—and the subculture in general—thrive on the degradation of women. And yet, it’s a myth that could not be further from the truth.

In all areas involving human participation you can find a bad element. BDSM is no exception in that respect. However, it is a miniscule percentage that is usually found among posers and wannabes that predominantly slither in and around the public venues and online hook-ups.

Personal Experience

The male role-models in my life predominantly taught me to follow the traditional values regarding females: love, cherish, honor, respect, and protect them. And, for the most part, I adhered to those teachings. But, not always.

In all honesty, there was a very confused and chaotic period in my life—much of it created through the actions of females—when, as a natural alpha, I consciously suppressed my normal inclination to protect the fair sex.

During that chaotic period, though filled with anger, I was still able to recognize various areas in society where sexism was either blatant or disguised. And even through the anger it bothered my sense of fair play.

It was also during that period that I became aware of the BDSM community.

Following a lengthy period of introspection and self-discovery I overcame my anger issues. And I quickly became aware of how my natural alpha personality fit comfortably into the D/s lifestyle. And the traditional views I had been taught since birth (how to honor, respect, and protect women, etc.) seemed tailor-made for being a Dom, and the responsibilities of the position: fulfilling the sub’s wants and needs while keeping them protected and safe.

The Power Exchange

Much of the myth claiming BDSM is degrading to women centers around misconceptions involving the Power Exchange customary in D/s relationships.

Much of the vanilla world is under the false belief that Doms are all male, subs are all female, and subs automatically give over total control to Doms; which, those of us involved in D/s relationships know is completely absurd.

All Doms are not male. All subs are not female. And, like the rest of society, all D/s relationships are not just male and female.

The Power Exchange is not an all-take, one-sided proposition. It is a negotiated agreement between two equal partners that is built on a loving, or consent and trust, foundation. And the more control given up by the sub transfers an equal amount of responsibility to the Dom to fulfill the sub’s wants and needs, while keeping them protected and safe.

Fem-doms / Dommes

While the Power Exchange shows both Dom and sub are equal partners in D/s relationships, the fact that there are fem-doms (Dommes) reaffirms the BDSM community’s acceptance of female equality.

Any culture, or subculture, that allows females to occupy the position of power subsequently cannot be a culture that predominantly degrades women.

Sub humiliation

Some myth defenders would like people to believe that because there are predominantly more female subs with male Doms involved with scenes or sessions using humiliation / degradation actions and words, it “proves” D/s is more degrading to women. But, that is completely illogical.

Doms only use humiliation / degradation in scenes after communication with their sub shows the sub’s desire and consent to have it used. In fact, any Dom that uses humiliation without consent is a poser or wannabe, and the sub should flee as fast as they can.

What others say

GS says: I’ve never felt degraded as a woman involved in D/s. I actually feel empowered.

KT says: I have gained strength during my two-years in the BDSM community. I have been able to do things I never thought I would be able to do for myself, for my pleasure and sexual growth.

PD says: My mate is my Domme. She has the control. And the humiliation to me is consensual.

JB says: Being involved in BDSM has allowed me to grow into the woman I’ve always wished I could be concerning my sexual identity.

Last Word

Let me iterate, in legitimate relationships in the D/s – BDSM community, Doms and subs are always equal partners. And any humiliation or degradation is primarily consensual (except in situations with posers, etc.). Unfortunately, as long as the vanilla world reads or watches misrepresentations of the D/s – BDSM world, myths will continue. Only through familiarization of the real thing will the myths dissolve.

Doms should never assume

There is an old saying that states: If you assume, you make an ‘ass’ out of ‘u’ and ‘me.’

Let me give you an example that began on the 5th of July in 2013. After going to the local ER, they took x-rays and did ultrasounds on me. The ER doctor gave a diagnosis that would radically alter my life. I was placed on oxygen and a regimen of medications, and then handed off to the VA doctors to follow-up the treatments.

I was told to use the oxygen 24/7, and that I would be on it the rest of my life, along with the medications.

I never did use the oxygen 24/7, and I eventually convinced them to cancel it. They also lowered the meds but refused to cancel them.

Over the next 5 years there were additional hospital stays, multiple exams with dozens of medical professionals, including 2 VA primary care physicians. And they all prescribed modified treatments for my diagnosed conditions.

That is, until recently, when I acquired a new primary care doctor. A doctor that chooses not to assume. Instead of following up on the set regimen, he went back over my entire medical history. And after double-checking all the x-rays, etc., he felt the original ER doctor misdiagnosed me back in 2013. And he set me up with some additional tests to verify his conclusion.

The final test was done in the wee hours of the morning on March 8th, 2018. By the afternoon, my doctor let me know I could stop the meds, because he confirmed I was misdiagnosed.

For 5 years each medical professional simply assumed the first diagnosis was correct, and it clouded their minds to every test, exam, condition, and even side-effects that I’ve endured until I finally got a doctor that looked at the evidence with fresh, unclouded eyes…and never assumed anything.

What kind of a Dom would I be if I assumed, upon meeting kat, that she needed me to be exactly like my previous D/s mate?

If I would have treated kat like my late wife needed and wanted to be treated it would have turned into a colossal fuck-up, just like all those medical professionals treating me based on a misdiagnosis they simply assumed to be correct.

Everyone is a unique individual, including all subs, and they need to be dealt with on an individual basis. Communicate, observe, and learn about them. And never make the foolish mistake of assuming something. Make sure before you act on it.

D/s: Dictator or Dom?

D/s—BDSM practitioners primarily involved in public venues, hook-ups, and other temporary or part-time play predominantly fall under the consent and trust relationship foundation, instead of the love foundation that most 24/7 couples build on [*see my post on D/s: comparing foundations]. Sadly, that is why posers, wannabes, and abusers can operate in the public venues for lengthy periods before the word gets out about them.

Curiously, while reading blogs over the past few months, I’ve noticed a disturbing trend among Doms / Dommes in 24/7 relationships. They are making statements and claims that mirror the negative aspects of various Doms / Dommes in the public venues, especially by posers, wannabes, and abusers.

In short, their claims and statements make them sound like little dictators over their subs. They appear to be forgetting some of the most important factors regarding D/s—BDSM relationships. Core elements of the power exchange, such as: Dom and sub are equal partners in the relationship; it is the sub’s wants and needs that drive the relationship, not the Dom’s / Domme’s; by accepting the power exchange and control over the sub the Dom / Domme accepts the responsibility to fulfill the wants and needs of the sub, while keeping them protected and safe physically and emotionally.

So, why are Doms / Dommes in 24/7 D/s relationships boastfully making claims like the following:

“It’s all about my pleasure. He must fulfill my desires. He has no rights, and he needs to know that I have no obligation to please him in anyway.”

“She needs to realize Master is everything. All my wants and needs get met daily. And if there’s no time for hers, she does without.”

“I don’t really know whether he likes what I do to him or not. He doesn’t share his feelings. So, as long as he fulfills my desires I’ll keep doing it my way.”

“She’ll take whatever I give her. I’m the King, she’s the slave. It’s all about pleasing me.”

It sounds like they are getting their dom training and beliefs from the same place, or they are reading each other’s blogs.

I might expect such statements from newbies; but most of the blogs I’m making reference to have been in D/s awhile, or claim to have researched it in-depth. If so, how did they fail to make the connection to basic core elements of D/s—BDSM relationships (such as those mentioned earlier)?

Doms / Dommes serve and protect
In Dom’s Guide to BDSM Vol.1, Mathew Larocco states the following:

…the Master actually has the more complicated role between the two. The master also has the task of giving pleasure and discipline to the slave or sub, and is less focused on taking pleasure himself. A great deal of what you do as a Master will be for the benefit of the sub. You must desire to please a partner, and not simply take what you want (emphasis added).

And for those that act like little dictators and don’t take the responsibility of being a Dom / Domme seriously, Larocco further adds the following:

Because if it’s a joke, or trying it is just an excuse to treat your partner like crap, then no, it’s not healthy and it’s not even going to be very pleasurable for you or your sub. The Caligula-take-all approach to BDSM is an outdated concept and it’s actually evolved into more complex characterizations today, rather than just the Overlord commanding his slave.

In other words, except for posers and abusers who don’t give a shit, newbies should be the only ones who succumb to the antiquated belief that Doms / Dommes have absolute power. But even newbies, if they’re serious about their D/s relationship, should quickly learn that is an erroneous belief.

Many experts in the lifestyle point out, like Larocco’s book, that one of the many misconceptions surrounding D/s—BDSM is falsely believing that “the Dominant controls the submissive.”

Power Exchange
In Leading and Supportive Love: the Truth about Dominant and Submissive Relationships, author Chris M. Lyons states the following:

A healthy Leading and Supportive Relationship is not about roles partners have, but rather the two types of partners who form a relationship that greatly serves both people: a true partnership.

Lyon further claims:

The partners are both dedicated in service to each other and both of them are very clear about it. There is immense appreciation because one could not be who they truly are in the relationship without the service of the other.

And Lyon, a personal coach and relationship expert, adds further credibility with the following:

Dr. Brad Sagarin, a professor of social and evolutionary psychology at Northern Illinois University, asserts that the s-type partner is “a fully-consensual entity” and “an equal partner in the negotiation of this relationship.

Similarly, Larocco includes claims from Studies in the Psychology of Sex by Havelock Ellis:

He [Havelock] also states another little understood secret of the BDSM lifestyle—sadomasochistic activities (distinguished from abusive relationships) involve the “express request of the masochist” who gives the sadist emotional cues and mutually understood signals—in essence prompting and guiding the sadist on how to properly give him pleasure and pain.

In other words, the Dom’s / Domme’s intention and duty is to please the sub. Thus, it is the sub that actually powers or drives the relationship.

“After all,” Larocco concludes, “it is consensual and voluntary, and the only reason a sub would stay in the ‘control’ of a Dom is to experience pleasure/pain in just the way he or she wants.”

It’s the Dom’s / Domme’s job to make their sub happy. They are not supposed to bully and break them for their own pleasure. They are supposed to be giving the sub what the sub wants and needs. That is their duty and service to the sub for accepting control over the sub in the power exchange.

The Doms / Dommes not doing this are acting like dictators, similar to posers and abusers, which we see in the public venues and hook-ups quite often. But it’s surprising to see the same attitudes and actions among the 24/7 D/s relationships lately. It’s a sad trend, since 24/7 D/s relationships are primarily built on foundations of love, not simply consent and trust.

Ignorance is no excuse
Several Doms / Dommes with the Caligula-take-all attitudes make references to not knowing what their sub honestly wants or needs. Nor do they know how their sub feels about the way they are being treated by the Dom / Domme. Both of which are serious failures on the part of the Doms /Dommes with regard to their responsibilities to their subs.

Remember, it is the Dom’s / Domme’s responsibility to fulfill the wants and needs of the sub. That cannot be done if they do not even know what their sub’s wants and needs are; nor how their subs even feel about what’s being done to them, or that they’re made to do without question.

A few of the Doms /Dommes claim their subs are shy, poor communicators, or just don’t like to talk about such things. Which, as experienced leaders know, are just excuses. And when a person relies on excuses to explain away an issue, perhaps they are not as ready for the responsibility of the position as they thought.

Communication: another Dom responsibility
It is the Dom’s / Domme’s responsibility to make sure the wants and needs of both partners are fully understood by both.

In Dom’s Guide to Submissive Training, author Elizabeth Cramer states the following:

Because there is no standard way for people to come into BDSM and everyone has their own ideas about everything from the definition of words to the way submission is practiced, it is important you have a spoken agreed-upon and clear understanding of what you both expect.

Cramer goes on to say:

The DNA of a Dom/sub relationship is consent. It is the foundational stone all the rest of the relationship will be built upon. She can’t give you consent if she doesn’t know exactly what you plan to do and what her service will be like.

While those of us in 24/7 D/s relationships would argue that love is the primary foundation of our relationships, we still acknowledge the need for consent, which is achieved through communication: another key element. And it’s the Dom’s / Domme’s responsibility to ensure that communication begins at the start of the relationship and continues throughout the relationship. And that means honest and open communication.

It’s too tempting for a lot of Doms / Dommes to let their subs make standard sub-claims like, “I just want you to lead and I’ll follow” or “I just want to make you happy.” But those type of statements do not tell the Dom / Domme what the sub truly wants or needs.

Cramer warns of the following:

Be aware that a woman who has a submissive nature is going to tell you everything you want to hear, especially if she can’t actually visualize it happening.

However, when it comes time for her to do it she may balk, or go through with it but hates it, which sets up relationship problems. And this is true of any submissive, male or female, along with anyone else that may have poor communication skills.

Several of the Doms / Dommes that made reference to not knowing, or not caring, about their sub’s wants, needs, or feelings, said they were going to keep doing it their way, and just surprise the subs with each new change.

That’s fine for gifts and rewards, but it can be highly stressful for subs facing the prospect of new levels of pain and/or humiliation.

Cramer suggests the following:

While training can seem unpredictable and challenging to a sub, you don’t want it to become so overwhelming that she withdraws from you. The best way to help her is to share your plans with her up front. This will help her see you are following a well-known methodology, and not just making stuff up.

I would add that it also gains trust when the sub sees their Dom / Domme taking the time to alleviate their fears. The same goes for consistently communicating from the beginning of the relationship onward.

Get even attitude
This is something that really surprises me with the trend I’ve been seeing among Doms / Dommes. And fem-doms seem especially prone to this response for some reason.

On rare occasions when the subs express their honest feelings about something they would rather not do, or they even subtly disagree with how their Dom / Domme is treating them, instead of accepting the sub’s right as an equal partner in the relationship to feel that way, the Doms / Dommes respond like a selfish child on the playground. They make statements like the following:

“I’ll teach him who’s boss! I’ll make him do every hard limit, then kiss and lick my ass afterward.”

“Or, when he criticizes (admittedly subtly and not outright) how I am dominating him. It’s frustrating, and I felt devalued as his Domme.”

“The little bitch had the nerve to ask me to change a ritual she hates. Well, who the fuck’s training who? I told her she’ll do it or get the fuck out.”

“He had the audacity to interrupt a session just to tell me he disliked something I was making him do. So, I made sure he did it again.”

Everyone of the above statements shows an attitude inappropriate for a Dom / Domme. They should be glad their sub is communicating with them. After all, it’s the Dom’s /Domme’s responsibility to fulfill the sub’s wants and needs while keeping them protected and safe. But if their character is not strong enough to accept constructive criticism, or if they take every claim or dislike by their sub as a personal attack that “devalues” them, maybe they should reevaluate if they have what it takes to be a good Dom / Domme. After all, for the above Doms / Dommes to respond as they did over their subs trying to honestly communicate with them is petty and childish. And no Dom / Domme should ever require a sub to do anything on their list of hard limits!

Doms / Dommes need to have the ability to place their sub’s wants, needs, and safety above their own pleasure. If they cannot do this consistently they will never be real Doms / Dommes. They will be no better than the posers and abusers in the public venues that get-off on the power trip of being little dictators.

Last word
If some of the Doms / Dommes quoted in this post (and others too numerous to include) made such statements in the heat of the moment, hopefully they calmed down enough to remember their responsibility as Doms / Dommes.

Unfortunately, from the number of dictator-like statements I’ve found, it really looks like a negative trend that will eventually take its toll on some of these relationships when the subs get fed-up with being overlooked as an equal partner in the relationship.

Positions of power always carry additional responsibility. Those who accept the positions must be willing to sacrifice their pleasures at times to ensure they are meeting the wants and needs of those they have control over, while keeping them protected and safe.

PS: As a natural Alpha, I have a strong urge to protect, and I feel an obligation to speak-up for subs who (for whatever reason) may feel they don’t have an equal say in their relationship. And if my words piss-off their Doms / Dommes, maybe they should question why? Obviously, the truth hurts.

Let go of the power trip and become a mature Dom / Domme. Take care of your sub and they’ll take care of you out of reverence…not just because of some role-playing obligation.


I’ve never been a trusting sort, especially when it comes to men. Too many times I’ve been hurt by the very ones who should have, above all others, protected me. Too many times I’ve had men who were in supposedly committed relationships hit on me. So sadly, by the time Alpha came into my life, I was pretty well soured on the opposite sex, and had no intention of investing in a relationship again. I swore to myself: never, ever, ever!

And then I met Alpha, and we became friends. And honest to God, in the beginning that’s all I thought we’d ever be. But quickly, friendship blossomed into love.

But I didn’t fully commit. I didn’t trust.

Circumstances forced us to be apart so often early in our relationship, that we got to know each other mainly through emails and phone calls. And it was during one of those long, nightly calls that Alpha told me he was an alpha male, and in subsequent ones that he desired a D/s relationship with me. I thought, er…okay…I guess…

We didn’t rush right into it. It was a gradual process of getting to know each other even better, of Alpha encouraging me to tell him my past, my thoughts, my fears, my hopes, my dreams, my fantasies. And he told me his. In all this talking (and writing), we found out how compatible we were, from basic core beliefs, to what we wanted in life, to what turned us on.

I didn’t realize at the time—though I’m sure Alpha knew—that opening ourselves up to one another as we had is a key part of D/s. That being able to share your bad side (sharing the good is easy), all those pathetic, ugly, uncharitable thoughts and feelings you keep locked away for fear you won’t be loved if you are honest, is one of the greatest gifts one person can give another. They know the very worst of you and still love you. You can let your guard down; you can trust.

And that carries over into sex. You don’t have to have a killer body because your body is loved just as it is. Just. As. It. Is. Because it houses you. The you that D/s requires you to share. You can trust.

And to me, that is the crux of D/s: trust. Trusting the other person to do their best, day after day, to put you above all others, to do what is best for you, to not hurt you, to be your defender and champion in a world that seems hell bent on crushing you. To love you unconditionally. And to give you lots of cuddles, spankings and amazing sex.

I have never been known by anyone as Alpha knows me. I have never trusted anyone as I do Alpha. He makes me feel worthy.

On my own, I would never have considered a D/s relationship; in fact, until I met Alpha, I had never heard of it, just BDSM (and wasn’t into it). But now that I’ve experienced D/s and the closeness it fosters, I can’t imagine Alpha’s and my relationship any other way. Past vanilla relationships pale in comparison. And who in their right mind would ever want to go back after experiencing a bond that unites you in mind, body, and soul? Not me!

Make-Up Sex: Does it live up to the hype?

[Allow me to stress, as I often do, that this blog is primarily targeting loving couples in a 24/7 D/s relationship.]


Contrary to Hollywood’s scripted outcomes, the testosterone testimonies and campus confessions of coeds-gone-wild, and lackadaisical writers filling space or spitting out sound-bytes, make-up sex isn’t the perfect cure-all for all relationship problems. But far too often couples still buy into the hype.

Grandiose claims are everywhere, like Lauren Martin’s article entitled, “Why make-up sex is the best part of every relationship.”

Martin claims “fighting is just a precursor to sex,” that “fighting is no longer cold…but so, so hot” in the “realm of love.” She further claims, “We’d be lying if we said that most of us haven’t picked a fight for that special reconciliation that comes right after it.”

If true, what does that say about human relationships, or the species in general? Yet, there are those who obviously accept such superficiality.

In a Men’s Fitness article by Amber Madison, entitled, “The guy’s guide to make-up sex,” she gives a four-point plan on how to zip through the fight with one goal in mind—to get to the sex quicker!

Well, it’s nice to know they have their priorities straight. Though I imagine these same deep thinkers probably wonder why their relationships fall apart, and why there’s a fifty-percent divorce rate.

Sex is a weak foundation
I have never seen or heard of a successful life-long relationship built solely on a foundation of sex.

Sure, sex can be passionate, exciting, playful, kinky, and many other things; but no sex, no matter how good, can sustain a relationship alone.

Even if you could engage in sex two hours a day, every day, that is still only one-twelfth the time you and your mate are together. And what happens when it becomes less and less time having sex? Or, when adjustments have to be made, along with times with no sex, because of illness, injury, or age

Where does that leave people like Martin, who claim make-up sex is the best part of every relationship?

Stronger foundation
Loving relationships should be built on much stronger foundations. They need to be built on a solid foundation of unconditional love, and fortified with compatibility, constant communication, honesty, trust, and mutual respect. Sex, especially in D/s relationships, should be used to enhance the loving relationship that is solidly grounded and fortified.

Make-up sex is no cure-all
There are situations where make-up sex seems to shine, but that still does not make it a positive.

In an article entitled, “5 Things No One Tells You About Make-Up Sex,” by Elizabeth Enochs, she claims make-up sex can be “superhot,” but only if arguing over something “stupid and trivial,” like whose turn it is to take out the trash. She goes on to say, “…in my limited experience, relying too much on make-up sex to smooth things over with your partner is both unhealthy and unsatisfying in the long-run.” And she further contends that if sex is used “to avoid talking about problems, or you frequently replace apologizing for inappropriate behavior with post-fight sex sessions,” it will almost always disappoint you, as well as damage your relationship.

Martin acknowledges the negatives, but takes a cavalier attitude. She says, “Of course, make-up sex can many times just be a diversion from the real problem. Instead of talking, couples are taking to the sheets and the problems aren’t getting resolved. But who cares?” (emphasis added)

Well, obviously she doesn’t care. And how many other relationships fall into disrepair because of such foolish beliefs?

In a Psychology Today article, Seth Meyers (Psy.D), states, “In general, make-up sex is bad news because it reinforces fighting and emotional drama.” However, he does stipulate that, “In a healthy relationship, two people can come together after a disagreement and share physical intimacy because they feel close.” But he goes on to say, “the search for greater intimacy and trust isn’t what motivates most make-up sex.” He claims, “most make-up sex results from having felt and expressed extreme negative emotions during a heated argument, without any true resolution afterward.” The individuals “hunger to switch gears and jump to the opposite end of the spectrum—to feel the high that comes with making up.” And for emphasis, he contends, “Honestly, it’s not that different from an addict who needs a hit of cocaine.”

Unfortunately, for relationships, it can be just as destructive as a drug addiction.

KG: It started slow, but picked up steam quickly. We were like sparring partners, bantering with words until someone said something bad enough to begin the fight. Boom! It was on. But then I didn’t care. I’d let her think she’d won just to fucking get it on.
(KG’s relationship was over just shy of a year.)

BP: We both had fiery tempers. We fought a lot. It made for great sex. Passionate, ya’ know. But nothing ever got settled. So, we split.

SY: Every weekend like clockwork, he’d drink then pick a fight. It was a game, a damn game. I knew because he never ever wanted to seriously discuss anything. Then he used that ‘never go to sleep angry’ line to push for make-up sex. And he wouldn’t stop till he got it, no matter how long it took. So, I gave it up just to shut him up—but I hated every minute of it. And soon hated him just as bad.

False intimacy
The intensity some people feel during make-up sex is often misconstrued as loving intimacy. Sadly, it is not.

Meyers states, “During make-up sex, couples often express extreme positive emotions, and they reach a momentary state of bliss. They declare grand statements of love and feel, in that moment… they belong together.”

Meyers rightfully contends that is not real intimacy. “Intimacy is about mutual love and balance, while drama is about extremes and fantasies.”

Allow me to state once more, make-up sex is no cure-all, and it’s not real intimacy. In fact, it is usually after couples have experienced the passionate sexual release that they go the other way: they feel sad, depressed, and even lonely when all the unresolved issues come crashing back into their minds, along with the old feelings.

Too many negatives
In my research, observation, and experience, I’ve come to the conclusion that make-up sex has too many negatives in the long-run.

For the most part, it fails to resolve the issues argued about, and it will not make you forget the issues when they come crashing back after the sexual stimulation settles.

The actual sex act rarely lives up to the hype; and even when it does, the unresolved issues bring disappointment and frustration. And when make-up sex sucks it compounds the issues even more.

Likewise, too many couples think make-up sex is an appropriate substitute for apologies and communication. They are wrong on both counts. Such beliefs and actions teardown respect and trust.

Similarly, the couples that succumb to the addictive qualities of make-up sex, discussed by Meyers, develop an unhealthy habit that eventually takes its toll on the relationship.

In my opinion, and the preponderance of evidence seems to back it up, the only time make-up sex shows any value is following trivial arguments (like whose turn it is to walk the dog), or when the argument topic is actually a lack of sex.

Last word
If you build your relationship on a solid foundation of unconditional love, and fortify it with compatibility, constant communication, honesty, trust, respect, etc., you will be able to deal with problematic issues appropriately. Such a foundation also allows for a vibrant sex life that can be passionate, playful, exploratory, completely satisfying—lacking nothing. You will not need to be tempted with the myth-factor of make-up sex which, in the long-run, does more harm than good. In fact, loving couples that communicate well, and resolve issues quickly have better sex lives (quantity and quality) then couples that argue a lot with many unresolved issues. And they spare each other the hurt feelings.

Hopefully, you’ll make your choice based on your heart and mind, and not on your libido.